21 Comments
User's avatar
Stan's avatar

All of this really boggles the mind, Steve. Personally, I knew that I wasn’t going to take any “vaccination“ even before they said mRNA. When they said that I knew there was not a chance in hell i’d take it. I viewed the technology as one of those things that I would consider for certain Serious illnesses if I ever came down with them where there were no other alternatives, but certainly not for a “vaccine“ against an airborne, respiratory virus that has non-human hosts. Even given all of that, I didn’t expect that the “vaccine” would be as damaging and deadly as it very much seems to have turned out to be.

Keep up to go to work.

Stan Toncich, PhD

Stan's avatar

LOL!! What for, Carroll?

Carroll Straus's avatar

Spreading fake science.

Stan's avatar

LOL!!! You poor thing. Fake science and lies is all we got and saw from the MSM, all of the medical trades and government entities during the entire Wuhan ‘pandemic’. You aren’t still falling for all of their bullshit are you?

Prometheus Sputnik's avatar

And people still think we are crazy and no one has been jailed for their crimes -- so are they just smearing it in our face ? Look we can kill you just like we like to. ??

RJ K's avatar

If this really is a conspiracy to lower the population, having symptoms after five years is the perfect crime. After 5 years, the population will never suspect the jab.

Easysteps's avatar

It might be obvious if millions die by 2029-2031, like the lab animals did, but humans always surprise me.

Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Good one ! Needs to be plastered all over the world.

Neil's avatar

The deaths up to 5 years after the diagnosis of myocarditis would they be classified as myocarditis deaths or early deaths subsequent to an episode of myocarditis. Is it possible for myocarditis to occur some years after receiving the covid jab?

Robert Skappel's avatar

Tusen tak for det !

Bob Cherba's avatar

I already had Hypertrophic Cardio Myopathy when I took the first two Modern Covid doses, but ten days after the second shot I developed Bradycardia and my pulse rate went down to 50 BPM. I could barely walk five steps. I spent a few days in a cardio ICU until I could be scheduled for a pacemaker. I believe the Covid vaccine caused my problem and the pacemaker saved my life.

Nj's avatar

How long AFTER a covid shot can someone get myocarditis?

RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

Isn’t it wonderful that some of the most “elite” and “admired” universities were aggressively mandating Myocarditis-inducing COVID jabs for their student populations? Young athletic males in particular are most susceptible to injection-induced heart complications. At least that is how I’ve always heard the narrative.

The local Rutgers University for example had one of the more strident COVID jab mandates for its captured students. How caring of them to force their kids in to the myocarditis and other harms lottery. Wonder if it had anything to do with the huge presence of J&J and Pharma in general in NJ and New Brunswick in particular, home of both Rutgers and J&J.

Universities have the big brains (don’t they?). They have “esteemed” medical and law divisions. They have all the resources to be “in the know” because the fact is, if they are not reading the research in their “esteemed” medical and biology divisions GOOD CHANCE they are actually DOING the research.

So it is hard to convince me they did not know what they were doing BECAUSE WE THE LAB RATS KNEW WHAT THEY WERE DOING just be reading the available (but heavily censored) information on the relationship of mRNA covid jabs to myocarditis (in young males particularly) and other harms.

SO WHICH IS IT?!

When the colleges with the medical departments and all the big brains shoved these cancer causing myocarditis inducing shots in to their students who were at virtually no risk was it because they are stupid? Could it be that all those esteemed researchers and PhD’s, some of them Nobel-prize adjacent, were too stupid and uninformed to know what the lab rats they wanted to inject already knew.

OR WERE THEY JUST EVIL?

Colleges have the intellectual fire power (so we’re told) to know far more than we the lab rats already knew about the harms of injected poison.

AND YET THEY SHOVED THAT CRAP IN TO THEIR STUDENT POPULATIONS

Precocious few stood up to voice objections

So much for free speech and freedom of thought. So much for the vaunted “free intellectual discourse” that the IVY halls are supposed too protect. Why is it that colleges are always “sanctuaries of freedom of thought” when some revolutionary lunatic is preaching “burn it all down” or “kill the oppressor” but if someone dares say “maybe we should not force our kids to inject poison” they are silenced?

Colleges have the resources to have known. In fact they likely had members involved in all the research leading up to the creation of these poisons. It is hard to believe they did not know.

How can we respect them?

Ben Blaz's avatar

Merely nearly interesting

homedetective's avatar

I beg your pardon if this has already been disclosed:

Here is what is behind the so-called "PREP" Act.

Population Reduction Endless Profit

Carroll Straus's avatar

BALONRY! "What the Study Actually FoundThe February 2023 study published in BMJ Medicine looked specifically at patients who were already hospitalized with new-onset myocarditis. It did not compare the overall population to see which event was a more frequent cause of the condition. The study's conclusion was that patients who developed myocarditis after the vaccine actually had better clinical outcomes within 90 days compared to those whose myocarditis was triggered by the COVID-19 virus or other conventional causes."

Debra's avatar

Thank you for all the research and documentation you’re doing, Steve. The effort you put into your work is mind boggling.

ActualData's avatar

There are 1 or 2 "recent studies" being touted by the vaccine advocate side, that allegedly show that the vaccines reduce all harms and particularly heart related harms. Has anyone dissected these? I saw mention of one or both, on X this week. I believe it was in a response to Aseem Malhotra, if that helps.

norica's avatar

Do not the shots protect people from myocarditis?

Carroll Straus's avatar

This is egregiously false. The study is basically the opposite happened. People who had been vaccinated when hospitalized for existing myocarditis.

"What the Study Actually FoundThe February 2023 study published in BMJ Medicine looked specifically at patients who were already hospitalized with new-onset myocarditis. It did not compare the overall population to see which event was a more frequent cause of the condition. The study's conclusion was that patients who developed myocarditis after the vaccine actually had better clinical outcomes within 90 days compared to those whose myocarditis was triggered by the COVID-19 virus or other conventional causes."