Just went on a couple of week vacation to Arizonia & when I returned home I learned that 5 friends (men & women) all had passed away. Everyone had received the whole COVERT Pachage including Boosters! Amazing how many who NEVER SMOKED are dying from Lung cancers that spreads throughout their body! VERY SAD! People need to be IMPRISONED for these Atrocities!
Yes, but that will never happen. Just the opposite--the political tyrants who coerced their subjects into taking the poison injections were re-elected.
Their rallying cry. Before Covid, when they were stumping hard for the measles vaccine, an article in The NY Times by the now-discredited health writer Jane Brody managed to mention the phrase no less than 3 times in one article. They are too stupid to hide their propaganda.
Let's remind them that the Supreme Court declared all the vaccines "inherently unsafe" in order to justify granting the manufacturers a liability shield in 1986.
Whistleblower report? BC, Canada, Bonnie Henry, Provincial Health Office, did she whistleblow on herself and her government? I am not a statistics expert but you all decide on what this inconsistent data means for yourselfs. -- Bonnie Henry, British Columbia data published in partnership with Satistics Canada. table 1 and table 2 data (not chart 1 and 2, table 1 and 2). Text does not highlight what is in tables. Odd.
Focus on women as male data tainted to much by drug o/d data.
Table 2, no drop in life expectancy in women of all ages in 2020, but drop in 2021
Table 1, covid-19 deaths per 100,000 for women 60-69, 5 per 100,000 in 2020 per vaccine, 27 per 100,000 in 2021 post vaccine, and 29 per 100,000 in 2022 after booster. Same pattern other older women age groups. Hmm. Did vax policy work? What do statistics experts say?
I think your title is waaaay to kind here, Jarle. Potential temporary protection? Naw.Never happened.
May have increased mortality? You and I both know that it did.
I know you're trying to ease the sceptics into accepting the fact that the covid vaxxine was neither safe, nor effective. That is, unless you say the vaxxine effectively killed and maimed as amny people as possible while safely giving the perpetrators who want us all dead plausible deniability.
Let us stop mincing words, and start calling a spade a spade. It is not a digging tool, or a mass removal tool.
at this rate it may also have been safe … but judging by the current trend around me, i doubt anyone but braindead zombies will believe that! in any case, the mrna platform has been deemed “safe and effective” with Nobel prizes awarded to the awesome threesome who pioneered and developed this gene “therapy”. more mrna therapies to come. RFK Jr failed!
"I doubt anyone but braindead zombies will believe that!"
Yes, brain dead smart phone zombies. I see them every day when I'm in out public areas. Truely repulsive. It makes me think that Heinz Kissofdeath was right when he said "Useless eaters", may he burn in Hell.
This claim is inaccurate and skewed. Actual data with proper statistical analysis show the following;
"What good data actually show
• A national cohort of about 28 million people (18–59 years old) followed for 4 years found no increased risk of all‑cause mortality in vaccinated individuals; mortality in the months after vaccination was actually about 29% lower compared with unvaccinated people.[pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih +1]
• A recent study of sudden deaths in 12–50‑year‑olds found that COVID vaccination did not increase the risk of sudden cardiac death in otherwise healthy people.[journals.plos +1]
• Multiple excess‑mortality and case‑control studies find that higher vaccination coverage is associated with lower, not higher, overall death rates, even after accounting for waves, age structure, and other factors.[feedback +3]
These are the kinds of peer‑reviewed, population‑level data that should anchor any mortality claim."
The French study is a joke. COVID-vaccinated were 26% less likely to die in traffic accidents compared to unvaccinated. It further found that the risk of dying from drowning was reduced by 27% among COVID-vaccinated and by 37% for breast cancer. And as if that weren’t enough, COVID-vaccinated women had a whopping 59% reduced likelihood of dying from birth complications compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.
Based on your handle, you might be interested in knowing the hidden meaning behind COVID 19.
DIVOC = Hebrew word 'dybbuk' --- Hebrew to English ---> 'possession'.
1 & 9 correspond to the letters A & I meaning artificial intelligence.
Hence, COVID 19 conveys the message 'possession by artificial intelligence'.
Coincidence?
Karen Kingston: "… it is the main ingredient in hydrogel which is the liquid the AI template that’s used for some of Elon Musk’s research and Bill Gates as far as creating an interface between humans and the internet."
Also note section 5 'mRNA Injectees: Chattel Property of IPR Holders in attorney Todd Callender's Open Secrets interview.
*{ When I first discovered this I was able to put 'DIVOC' in an online Hebrew-to-English translator and it gave me the word 'possession' but now it is not doing that. }
My test on people presenting information is how accurate their information is at predicting the future. If someone yells 'Wolf' and if there is a wolf out there you better listen.
Karen Kingston claimed the COVID shot had graphene oxide and the FDA confirmed graphene oxide in the COVID shot a year later.
Source: FDA confirms Graphene Oxide is in the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines after being forced to publish Confidential Pfizer Documents by order of the US Federal Court
that study belongs on comedy central along with a similar study done in Canada at Sunnybrook which found that smaller % of covid vaccinated individuals got into car accidents compared to the % of unvaccinated (both % were calculated relative to their own populations with a 90/10 split between vaccinated and unvaccinated). when one looked at the ACTUAL number of accidents, the # in the vaccinated group was many folds higher than in the unvaccinated group … total joke! they then tried to use it to suggest different car insurance rates between the 2 groups which no insurance company took seriously because the “people of science” who came up with this “study” are complete imbeciles.
The french study names and can only partly correct for these things, and so tries not to make too grand claims about vaccine effectiveness, in spite of the fact that the actual numbers found look very positive at first glance.
do you live in a black box with gloves on your hands and a surgical mask still on? how does a gene therapy protect against any kind of respiratory infection … are you completely unfamiliar with what Dr Redfield revealed about the covid and flu quaccine failures after his stint as head of the CDC? if you want to prove your point, please continue to follow the science and take endless boosters … there’s another variant out there right now for the hypochondriacs! you’re in luck. maybe you want to volunteer for Pfizer’s new covid booster trial because they are shutting it down as we speak due to a lack of guinea pigs … hurry, it may be your lucky day.
looks like this got posted as a reply to the wrong person … it was a reply to “there’s none so blind as he will not see” … may want to replace “he” with “she”
There's none so blind as he will not see. People are here defending their bias and pretending it's science. It's not science. It's bias and it's false. The facts are as follows.
"What the study actually does (in brief)
Uses the entire French national health database: >28 million adults, 22.7M vaccinated vs 5.9M unvaccinated.
Adjusts for age, sex, region, socioeconomic indicators, and 41 specific comorbidities in weighted Cox regression models.
Separates short‑term and long‑term mortality to handle time‑related biases, and examines causes of death up to the extent data are available.
Finds no increase and, in fact, a substantial decrease in all‑cause mortality among vaccinated adults, robust across sensitivity analyses.
From a critical‑reading, lawyer‑brain standpoint: there are reasonable discussions to have about residual confounding and generalizability (as with any observational cohort), but calling the whole thing a “joke” is ideological branding, not a fair reading of the methods."
Carroll Straus we are seeing with our own eyes people dropping like flies from the COVID shot. We knew before the COVID shot was rolled out, animals in the test studies died. As Jarle Arstad pointed out in the comment above mine, your critical thinking in regards to these studies is what is at fault.
Let me help you get up to speed on the COVID shot. The interview/transcript with attorney Todd Callender is like the Cliff Notes of the COVID shot. It covers a lot of ground. The remedy section -section 13- was from back in 2022 so its a little dated.
Exactly. So i did. Not easy seperating the sheep from the goats though. Firefighters and fireshouters. It took a lot of doing own research, but in the end i think i fairly managed.
Thank you. In 2020 they rebranded the 'flu which was why 'flu almost disappeared from the statistics to be replaced by COVID 19. All vaccines are pointless at best, otherwise they cause harm to varying degrees.
The unvaccinated may be even healthier by average than before covid "thanks" to covid. Although also they will have the covid-effect among the surviving. (Past/repeated infections and possible consequences for general health.) Probably even stronger than vaccinated, because covid was not diminished by vaccine.
The vaccinated are probably not healthier by average than before covid. Thanks (still) to vaccination.
They are still healthier than the unvaccinated by average. But not as healthy and as healthier as before.
Unhealthy unvaccinated died more often of covid, so the surviving unvaccinated got relatively more and more healthy.
Unhealthy vaccinated survived more often, so the vaccinated got more unhealthy relatively to the unvaccinated.
What left is (past) covidinfections making people unhealthier and either vaccinated or unvaccinated die more often of other causes, but less and less for the unvaccinated, because the unhealthy of them die of covid much more often than the vaccinated unhealthy. So the unvaccinated get more and more healthy (because the dying of the unhealthy), but the vaccinated get more and more unhealthy (because of (past) covid. which has many other effects than only death. Effects you may suffer when you survive covid. Which you do thanks to vaccination.)
Something like that?
Still it could also partly be vaccination. And such should be researched ans assessed. But the slightly risen unhealthiness of the vaccinated during the pandemic is so small that i (fwiw) can hardly imagine it is not just the covid effect on general health.
A kinder interpretation (kinder to the vaccine, not the victims) is that the category "vaccinated" tends to select for the elderly, the weaker of body, and the weaker of mind: those less likely to thrive. Of course, both interpretations can be true, with each having contributed to the outcome.
The Covid plan was carried out, never meaning to protect.
Amen, Amen, Amen...... I could not have said it any better! The real shame is those that believe it was really a vaccine!
Can we now see this with data till 2025 or 2026? Is the trend/difference remaining to today? I am disappointed to see the study stop at 2023...
I would love to run further analyses, but the data stops on May 23.
Now why is that, I wonder. Rhetorical question 5089.
That's unfortunate and understandable. Do you know when it'll more data will become available into 25 and 26 so we can do this analysis?
I don’t think they will release more data.
I don't think so either, and you and I both know the reason why.
Just went on a couple of week vacation to Arizonia & when I returned home I learned that 5 friends (men & women) all had passed away. Everyone had received the whole COVERT Pachage including Boosters! Amazing how many who NEVER SMOKED are dying from Lung cancers that spreads throughout their body! VERY SAD! People need to be IMPRISONED for these Atrocities!
No one sane believes you
GOOD! Go get more Boosters & meet your maker! FENTENYL KILLS, too!
Weak, lying wingnut.
Yes, but that will never happen. Just the opposite--the political tyrants who coerced their subjects into taking the poison injections were re-elected.
These heartwarming stories are so uplifting 👍
SAFE and EFFECTIVE----sad that so many still believe this.
Their rallying cry. Before Covid, when they were stumping hard for the measles vaccine, an article in The NY Times by the now-discredited health writer Jane Brody managed to mention the phrase no less than 3 times in one article. They are too stupid to hide their propaganda.
Let's remind them that the Supreme Court declared all the vaccines "inherently unsafe" in order to justify granting the manufacturers a liability shield in 1986.
Nice work. You are right. they don't want to release more data for some reason. Baffling!
However, the years 2020 to 2023 are quite revealing.
Whistleblower report? BC, Canada, Bonnie Henry, Provincial Health Office, did she whistleblow on herself and her government? I am not a statistics expert but you all decide on what this inconsistent data means for yourselfs. -- Bonnie Henry, British Columbia data published in partnership with Satistics Canada. table 1 and table 2 data (not chart 1 and 2, table 1 and 2). Text does not highlight what is in tables. Odd.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2025002/article/00001-eng.htm
Focus on women as male data tainted to much by drug o/d data.
Table 2, no drop in life expectancy in women of all ages in 2020, but drop in 2021
Table 1, covid-19 deaths per 100,000 for women 60-69, 5 per 100,000 in 2020 per vaccine, 27 per 100,000 in 2021 post vaccine, and 29 per 100,000 in 2022 after booster. Same pattern other older women age groups. Hmm. Did vax policy work? What do statistics experts say?
There was no covid-19. Hard to wrap head around "mortality for that which wasn't "
For sure the vax was poison with no possible benefit. Luckily not all that took it got sick or died.
I think your title is waaaay to kind here, Jarle. Potential temporary protection? Naw.Never happened.
May have increased mortality? You and I both know that it did.
I know you're trying to ease the sceptics into accepting the fact that the covid vaxxine was neither safe, nor effective. That is, unless you say the vaxxine effectively killed and maimed as amny people as possible while safely giving the perpetrators who want us all dead plausible deniability.
Let us stop mincing words, and start calling a spade a spade. It is not a digging tool, or a mass removal tool.
IT WAS NEVER A VACCINE BUT A POISONUS JAB. WHY KEEP SUPPORTING BIG PHARMS BY NOT TELLING THIS REAL FACT.
… “may have increased mortality” …
MAY? …
at this rate it may also have been safe … but judging by the current trend around me, i doubt anyone but braindead zombies will believe that! in any case, the mrna platform has been deemed “safe and effective” with Nobel prizes awarded to the awesome threesome who pioneered and developed this gene “therapy”. more mrna therapies to come. RFK Jr failed!
"I doubt anyone but braindead zombies will believe that!"
Yes, brain dead smart phone zombies. I see them every day when I'm in out public areas. Truely repulsive. It makes me think that Heinz Kissofdeath was right when he said "Useless eaters", may he burn in Hell.
Great work
Yet another odd representation of a reality which was never intended to become apparent... ;-/
This claim is inaccurate and skewed. Actual data with proper statistical analysis show the following;
"What good data actually show
• A national cohort of about 28 million people (18–59 years old) followed for 4 years found no increased risk of all‑cause mortality in vaccinated individuals; mortality in the months after vaccination was actually about 29% lower compared with unvaccinated people.[pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih +1]
• A recent study of sudden deaths in 12–50‑year‑olds found that COVID vaccination did not increase the risk of sudden cardiac death in otherwise healthy people.[journals.plos +1]
• Multiple excess‑mortality and case‑control studies find that higher vaccination coverage is associated with lower, not higher, overall death rates, even after accounting for waves, age structure, and other factors.[feedback +3]
These are the kinds of peer‑reviewed, population‑level data that should anchor any mortality claim."
The French study is a joke. COVID-vaccinated were 26% less likely to die in traffic accidents compared to unvaccinated. It further found that the risk of dying from drowning was reduced by 27% among COVID-vaccinated and by 37% for breast cancer. And as if that weren’t enough, COVID-vaccinated women had a whopping 59% reduced likelihood of dying from birth complications compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.
What a vaccine effect!
https://jarle.substack.com/p/covid-vaccinated-were-26-less-likely
Beware the cook that doesn't eat his own food
Canadian PM Trudeau fakes COVID shot
https://www.newstarget.com/2022-02-03-nurse-claims-trudeaus-covid19-vaccination-was-faked.html
Pfizer employees get batch different from public -
Using Wayback Machine - found the original article.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240512170415/https://en-volve.com/2024/05/12/pfizer-whistleblower-reportedly-alleges-company-offered-separate-and-distinct-covid-19-jabs-to-workers-internal-email/
Big Pharma President CAUGHT with FAKE VAX PASSPORT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_jfrMJ0zoE
When you catch someone in a lie its easy to spot the anomalies.
"Beware the cook that doesn't eat his own food."
Good one, Karl! Thank you for the wayback link. Saline solution.
Based on your handle, you might be interested in knowing the hidden meaning behind COVID 19.
DIVOC = Hebrew word 'dybbuk' --- Hebrew to English ---> 'possession'.
1 & 9 correspond to the letters A & I meaning artificial intelligence.
Hence, COVID 19 conveys the message 'possession by artificial intelligence'.
Coincidence?
Karen Kingston: "… it is the main ingredient in hydrogel which is the liquid the AI template that’s used for some of Elon Musk’s research and Bill Gates as far as creating an interface between humans and the internet."
Also note section 5 'mRNA Injectees: Chattel Property of IPR Holders in attorney Todd Callender's Open Secrets interview.
Video and Transcript - Open Secrets Interview
https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/ToddCallender-CCsession97-032522.html
Source:
Former Pfizer Employee Confirms ‘Vaccine’ is POISON
– Jan 6 ‘Commission’ HOAX! Gun Grab Underway! / 28 July 2021
https://rumble.com/v146wdq-former-pfizer-employee-confirms-poison-in-covid-vaccine-by-stew-peters-show.html
Wikipedia | Dybbuk meaning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dybbuk
*{ When I first discovered this I was able to put 'DIVOC' in an online Hebrew-to-English translator and it gave me the word 'possession' but now it is not doing that. }
Sorry. Karen Kingston and Todd Callender likes to push what Sasha Latypova calls fear porn, and I for one don't buy it.
My test on people presenting information is how accurate their information is at predicting the future. If someone yells 'Wolf' and if there is a wolf out there you better listen.
Karen Kingston claimed the COVID shot had graphene oxide and the FDA confirmed graphene oxide in the COVID shot a year later.
Source: FDA confirms Graphene Oxide is in the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines after being forced to publish Confidential Pfizer Documents by order of the US Federal Court
https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/85118/fda-confirms-graphene-oxide-is-in-the-mrna-covid19-vaccines-after-being-forced-to-publish.html
I referenced both Karen Kingston and attorney Todd Callender because what they are said supports the hidden meaning behind COVID 19.
Otherwise, people could just say the hidden meaning is a random coincidence.
that study belongs on comedy central along with a similar study done in Canada at Sunnybrook which found that smaller % of covid vaccinated individuals got into car accidents compared to the % of unvaccinated (both % were calculated relative to their own populations with a 90/10 split between vaccinated and unvaccinated). when one looked at the ACTUAL number of accidents, the # in the vaccinated group was many folds higher than in the unvaccinated group … total joke! they then tried to use it to suggest different car insurance rates between the 2 groups which no insurance company took seriously because the “people of science” who came up with this “study” are complete imbeciles.
Just showes to go you that they like jugling with numbers to get the result they want.
It reminds me of George Orwell's Ministry of Truth: 2+2= 3, 4 AND 5 at the same time.
The french study names and can only partly correct for these things, and so tries not to make too grand claims about vaccine effectiveness, in spite of the fact that the actual numbers found look very positive at first glance.
They are very explicit about this.
Good!
do you live in a black box with gloves on your hands and a surgical mask still on? how does a gene therapy protect against any kind of respiratory infection … are you completely unfamiliar with what Dr Redfield revealed about the covid and flu quaccine failures after his stint as head of the CDC? if you want to prove your point, please continue to follow the science and take endless boosters … there’s another variant out there right now for the hypochondriacs! you’re in luck. maybe you want to volunteer for Pfizer’s new covid booster trial because they are shutting it down as we speak due to a lack of guinea pigs … hurry, it may be your lucky day.
looks like this got posted as a reply to the wrong person … it was a reply to “there’s none so blind as he will not see” … may want to replace “he” with “she”
Its corrupted data. Every one of those 'peer-reviewed' articles is going to be thrown out.
Check it out. They are adding deaths over 5 years from when they are reported.
https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/vaers-still-publishing-ancient-covid
There's none so blind as he will not see. People are here defending their bias and pretending it's science. It's not science. It's bias and it's false. The facts are as follows.
"What the study actually does (in brief)
Uses the entire French national health database: >28 million adults, 22.7M vaccinated vs 5.9M unvaccinated.
Adjusts for age, sex, region, socioeconomic indicators, and 41 specific comorbidities in weighted Cox regression models.
Separates short‑term and long‑term mortality to handle time‑related biases, and examines causes of death up to the extent data are available.
Finds no increase and, in fact, a substantial decrease in all‑cause mortality among vaccinated adults, robust across sensitivity analyses.
From a critical‑reading, lawyer‑brain standpoint: there are reasonable discussions to have about residual confounding and generalizability (as with any observational cohort), but calling the whole thing a “joke” is ideological branding, not a fair reading of the methods."
Ancient Navajo proverb: It is impossible to wake someone who is pretending to sleep. Stop pretending, Carroll! Denial is NOT a river in Africa.
Carroll Straus we are seeing with our own eyes people dropping like flies from the COVID shot. We knew before the COVID shot was rolled out, animals in the test studies died. As Jarle Arstad pointed out in the comment above mine, your critical thinking in regards to these studies is what is at fault.
Let me help you get up to speed on the COVID shot. The interview/transcript with attorney Todd Callender is like the Cliff Notes of the COVID shot. It covers a lot of ground. The remedy section -section 13- was from back in 2022 so its a little dated.
Video and Transcript
https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/ToddCallender-CCsession97-032522.html
With only my own eyes i saw even the opposite. So own eyes apparently are not sufficient for a good assessment.
Which means you need to look again. If someone is telling you there is danger ahead and you don't listen the consequences are on you.
Exactly. So i did. Not easy seperating the sheep from the goats though. Firefighters and fireshouters. It took a lot of doing own research, but in the end i think i fairly managed.
And to pandemic mocking.
'distinguish' may be better.
Was not easy.
Thank you. In 2020 they rebranded the 'flu which was why 'flu almost disappeared from the statistics to be replaced by COVID 19. All vaccines are pointless at best, otherwise they cause harm to varying degrees.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/what-is-the-flu-aka-covid-19-and?utm_source=publication-search
The unvaccinated may be even healthier by average than before covid "thanks" to covid. Although also they will have the covid-effect among the surviving. (Past/repeated infections and possible consequences for general health.) Probably even stronger than vaccinated, because covid was not diminished by vaccine.
The vaccinated are probably not healthier by average than before covid. Thanks (still) to vaccination.
They are still healthier than the unvaccinated by average. But not as healthy and as healthier as before.
Unhealthy unvaccinated died more often of covid, so the surviving unvaccinated got relatively more and more healthy.
Unhealthy vaccinated survived more often, so the vaccinated got more unhealthy relatively to the unvaccinated.
What left is (past) covidinfections making people unhealthier and either vaccinated or unvaccinated die more often of other causes, but less and less for the unvaccinated, because the unhealthy of them die of covid much more often than the vaccinated unhealthy. So the unvaccinated get more and more healthy (because the dying of the unhealthy), but the vaccinated get more and more unhealthy (because of (past) covid. which has many other effects than only death. Effects you may suffer when you survive covid. Which you do thanks to vaccination.)
Something like that?
Still it could also partly be vaccination. And such should be researched ans assessed. But the slightly risen unhealthiness of the vaccinated during the pandemic is so small that i (fwiw) can hardly imagine it is not just the covid effect on general health.
(This peak on the end is a flu wave or so?)
A kinder interpretation (kinder to the vaccine, not the victims) is that the category "vaccinated" tends to select for the elderly, the weaker of body, and the weaker of mind: those less likely to thrive. Of course, both interpretations can be true, with each having contributed to the outcome.